All Resources
Legal Technology

PC Law Remote Access for Law Firms

A bookkeeper working from home on billing day needs the same reliable access to PC Law as if she were sitting at her desk in the office, and trust accounting data sitting behind a poorly secured remote connection is not a risk any firm should accept for the sake of convenience. Setting up PC Law remote access properly means balancing performance with the added security obligations that come with financial data.

Published August 10, 2026 Updated August 10, 2026 8 min read By Joshua Arimoro Greater Sudbury & Ontario
The short answer

PC Law remote access should be set up through either a secure VPN connection to the firm's network or a published-desktop session, always protected with multi-factor authentication. Given that PC Law holds trust accounting data, remote access security controls should be at least as strict as those protecting Primafact case files, if not stricter given regulatory recordkeeping expectations.

Why PC Law remote access carries extra weight

PC Law manages trust accounting and billing, financial records tied directly to a firm's Law Society obligations. Remote access to this system is not simply a convenience feature, it is an extension of the firm's financial controls, and it needs to be designed with that responsibility in mind rather than treated the same as remote access to general office files.

Choosing between VPN and published desktop

  • VPN connection to the firm's network: works well for PC Law's relatively lightweight data transfer compared to document-heavy applications, provided the connection is properly secured
  • Published desktop or remote session: keeps the application and data entirely on infrastructure inside the firm, with only the screen image sent to the remote device, offering an additional layer of separation for sensitive financial data
  • Either approach can work well for PC Law specifically, since its data transfer needs are lighter than a document-heavy application like Primafact, but the security configuration matters more than the specific method chosen

Required security controls for PC Law remote access

  • Multi-factor authentication enforced on every remote connection without exception
  • Remote devices enrolled in endpoint protection and kept current on security updates
  • Access limited to what each remote user's role actually requires within PC Law
  • Session timeouts so an unattended remote session does not remain open indefinitely
  • Remote access activity logged and reviewed periodically as part of ongoing cybersecurity practice

Need Secure Remote Access to PC Law?

We design and test PC Law remote access that protects trust accounting data without slowing your billing staff down.

Book a Remote Access Review

Setting up remote access for billing and accounting staff

Bookkeepers and billing staff working remotely often need to print trust cheques or generate invoices from home, which adds a wrinkle that lawyers using Primafact remotely typically do not face. A published-desktop approach handles this more cleanly, since local printers connected to the remote session can be mapped through to the firm's network printers without routing sensitive financial data directly to an unmanaged home printer configuration.

Firms should also confirm that any locally saved reports or exported files from a remote PC Law session are handled according to the firm's data retention and confidentiality policies, rather than left sitting on a personal device.

Coordinating with lawyers who also need Primafact remotely

In most firms, the same infrastructure decision, VPN versus published desktop, should apply consistently across both PC Law and Primafact rather than running two different remote access systems with different security postures. See our guide to Primafact remote access and the broader picture in running Primafact and PC Law together for how to design one remote access approach that serves the whole firm.

Testing remote access before staff depend on it

Remote access should be tested with real billing and trust accounting tasks, not just a login check, before staff are told to rely on it for a genuine work-from-home day. A test that stops at successful login can miss printing issues, permission gaps, or performance problems that only appear when someone actually tries to process a trust transaction remotely.

Offboarding and access review discipline

Remote access to trust accounting software should be reviewed and revoked immediately when a staff member leaves the firm, with no gap between departure and access removal. This should be documented as a formal step in the firm's offboarding process, tied into the firm's backup and disaster recovery and overall managed IT services planning, rather than left as an informal task someone remembers to do eventually.

Setting up and validating PC Law remote access

  1. Decide on VPN or published-desktop approach consistently across the firm.
  2. Configure multi-factor authentication for every remote user before granting access.
  3. Set role-based permissions matching each remote user's actual job function.
  4. Test with a real billing entry and, if applicable, a real trust cheque print.
  5. Document the setup process for onboarding future remote staff.
  6. Review access quarterly and immediately upon any staff departure.

Frequently asked questions

Is VPN or published desktop better for PC Law remote access?

Both can work well for PC Law's lighter data transfer needs, but the security configuration around whichever method is chosen matters more than the choice itself, given the sensitivity of trust accounting data.

Can trust cheques be printed remotely?

Yes, with the right setup. A published-desktop session can map through to network printers at the office, which is generally more secure than routing sensitive financial documents to an unmanaged home printer.

Does remote access to PC Law require extra security compared to normal remote work?

Given the trust accounting and financial data involved, PC Law remote access should meet at least the same security standard as any other sensitive system, including mandatory multi-factor authentication and prompt access revocation upon staff departure.

Should PC Law and Primafact use the same remote access method?

Ideally yes. Using one consistent approach across both applications is simpler to manage and secure than running two separate remote access systems for the same firm.

About the author

Joshua Arimoro

Joshua Arimoro is the Principal Consultant at Nickel City Tech Solutions, a managed IT and cybersecurity provider based in Lively, Ontario, serving businesses across Greater Sudbury and Northern Ontario. He works hands-on with Microsoft 365, server and network infrastructure, endpoint management, and backup and recovery for small and mid-sized organisations.

More about our team

Give Your Billing Team Secure Remote Access

Let us set up and test PC Law remote access that keeps trust accounting data protected.

Keep exploring

Related services, locations, and resources

Related services

Related resources