All Resources
Legal Technology

Primafact Remote Access for Lawyers Working from Home and Court

A lawyer standing outside a courtroom trying to pull up a medical record over a phone hotspot is not a hypothetical, it happens regularly, and it exposes exactly how well or poorly a firm's remote access has been designed. Primafact remote access needs to handle large documents, protect confidential client data, and work reliably from locations the firm does not control.

Published August 10, 2026 Updated August 10, 2026 8 min read By Joshua Arimoro Greater Sudbury & Ontario
The short answer

Primafact remote access should use either a published-desktop or remote-session approach, where the application runs on infrastructure inside the firm and only the screen travels over the connection, or a well-configured VPN with adequate bandwidth. A plain VPN mapped directly to a file share often performs poorly for large document sets over home or mobile connections.

Why Primafact remote access is harder than typical remote work

Most remote access setups are built around email and web applications that transfer small amounts of data. Primafact users routinely open large scanned PDFs and productions, and pulling those files across a home internet connection or mobile hotspot can be painfully slow if the remote access method was not chosen with that workload in mind.

This is one of the reasons remote performance issues are often mistaken for a Primafact problem rather than a connectivity design issue, similar to the pattern described in our guide on why Primafact runs slow.

VPN versus published desktop: choosing the right approach

There are two common ways to give remote staff access to Primafact, and the right choice depends on document volume and connection quality.

  • VPN with mapped file share: workable for light use on strong connections, but document transfer happens over the remote link itself, which slows down quickly with large files
  • Published desktop or remote session: the application runs on a server inside the firm's network, and only screen images travel to the remote device, which performs far better for large document sets over unpredictable connections
  • Hybrid approach: VPN for staff with strong home connections and light document use, published desktop for heavy users and anyone working from court or a client site

Setting up remote access securely

  • Multi-factor authentication required for every remote connection, no exceptions
  • Devices used for remote access enrolled in endpoint protection and kept current on updates
  • Access limited to what each user's role requires rather than blanket access to the full case file share
  • Session timeouts configured so an unattended device does not stay connected indefinitely
  • Remote access logs reviewed periodically as part of ongoing cybersecurity practice

Need Reliable Remote Access for Your Litigation Team?

We design and test Primafact remote access for real document workloads, not just email and browsing.

Book a Remote Access Review

Making court and mobile access practical

Lawyers working from a courthouse frequently rely on cellular data rather than reliable Wi-Fi, which makes a lightweight published-desktop connection especially valuable since it minimizes the data that needs to travel over an unreliable link. Testing this setup with real case files, not a small sample document, before a lawyer relies on it in a live courtroom situation avoids an unpleasant surprise at the worst possible moment.

Firms should also plan for what happens if a mobile connection drops mid-session. A published-desktop approach generally reconnects a user to the same session in progress, while a VPN-based file transfer that drops partway through may need to restart entirely.

Confidentiality obligations for remote access

Client confidentiality obligations do not pause because a lawyer is working from a coffee shop or a courthouse hallway. Devices used to access case files remotely should be encrypted, protected by endpoint security, and covered under the same offboarding process as in-office equipment, so access is closed immediately when a lawyer or staff member leaves the firm.

Firms running PC Law alongside Primafact should extend the same remote access design to billing staff working remotely, which is covered in our guide to PC Law remote access and in the combined approach described in running Primafact and PC Law together.

Backup considerations for remote work

Remote access should never mean local copies of case files sitting unprotected on a laptop. Documents accessed remotely should stay on the server side wherever the remote access method allows, with the firm's backup and disaster recovery plan continuing to cover the authoritative copy of the case file rather than any local downloads.

Testing before staff rely on it

  1. Pick a small group of users with varying connection quality to pilot the chosen remote access method.
  2. Test opening large real case files, not small sample documents, from home and from a mobile connection.
  3. Confirm multi-factor authentication and session security work as expected before wider rollout.
  4. Document the setup steps so new staff can be onboarded quickly.
  5. Review performance again after a few weeks of real use, and adjust bandwidth or method if needed.

Frequently asked questions

Is a VPN good enough for Primafact remote access?

It depends on the user's connection and document volume. A VPN can work for light, occasional use on a strong connection, but a published-desktop approach generally performs better for staff who regularly open large documents remotely.

Can lawyers access Primafact securely from court?

Yes, with the right setup. A published-desktop session minimizes the data that needs to travel over a mobile connection, which makes it more reliable than a VPN-based file transfer in an unpredictable courthouse network environment.

Do remote devices need special security?

Yes. Multi-factor authentication, device encryption, and endpoint protection should be required for any device accessing case files remotely, whether firm-owned or personal.

What if a lawyer's home internet is unreliable?

A published-desktop connection generally tolerates a dropped connection better than a VPN-based file transfer, since the session and the data both stay on the server side rather than being interrupted mid-transfer.

About the author

Joshua Arimoro

Joshua Arimoro is the Principal Consultant at Nickel City Tech Solutions, a managed IT and cybersecurity provider based in Lively, Ontario, serving businesses across Greater Sudbury and Northern Ontario. He works hands-on with Microsoft 365, server and network infrastructure, endpoint management, and backup and recovery for small and mid-sized organisations.

More about our team

Give Your Litigation Team Reliable Remote Access

Let us design and test a remote access setup built for real case files, not just email and browsing.

Technologies mentioned in this article

See what we support around each platform on our supported technologies hub.

Keep exploring

Related services, locations, and resources

Related services

Related resources